Upon close inspection, we can see that the UN’s SDGs are neither truly about sustainability or development. Instead, there is colorful language with vague promises that propose a very unsustainable and inequitable way to get there. It is worth asking the question, who is benefitting the most from these propositions? Is it to create a new world for everyone or to place some strategic restrictions to build a better world for the select few?

The United Nations wields an enormous amount of power, so much that it should make anyone nervous, or at the very least critical. The sheer size and scope of the organization is immense along with its not-so-subtle agenda and supporters. Agriculture, being the lynchpin of every civilized society, is among one of the first industries to be caught in the UN’s crosshairs for global reformation. To put this into clear perspective, let’s examine how it gets caught up in the infamo

The goal has always been to control the world’s wealth, resources, and population and the UN is making massive headway under the Rio and Paris accords.

If you could imagine what the world will look like in one hundred years, what do you see? A more moderate climate? A healthier population with longer life expectancy? What would you be willing to sacrifice so future generations can experience the utopian view of a few elites? Are you willing to sacrifice your personal freedoms, property rights, possessions, your favorite foods, vacations, jobs you love, and even your beloved pets?

The work Western Justice does is focused on our right to own, enjoy, and humanely use animals as part of our Western lifestyles and livelihoods, from animal-centered sports to ranching. But did you know that it’s just one piece of a much larger puzzle in the global battle for human freedoms and prosperity?

In Coulee City, Washington, a generational ranching family stands accused of crimes they didn’t commit—because the state decided to make an example of them. What began as a minor bureaucratic dispute has become a full-blown crusade, weaponizing environmental law against the very people who help feed America.

Big things are happening at Western Justice. With the current administration, we have an unprecedented opportunity to advocate for Western lifestyles and livelihoods, and we are doing just that.

The immense overpopulation of wild equids is having a devastating effect on the semi-arid high desert environment and scarce water resources, native wildlife populations, ranchers’ grazing rights, and on the welfare of the horses themselves.

THLN presents itself as “the only Texas-based organization focused on addressing unjust animal welfare laws.” However, critics argue that it is an animal liberation group advancing an extremist agenda under the guise of animal welfare. The organization leverages grassroots activism and high-profile lobbyists, positioning itself as the dominant voice on animal-related legislation in the state.

Like many animal rights groups, SRAP cloaks its mission in appealing language about “protecting family farms” and “preserving natural resources.” However, their ultimate objective is clear: to end animal agriculture. They leverage emotional rhetoric, misleading data, and grassroots front groups to gain support and donations while pushing an extremist anti-farming agenda.

On its website, TPP describes itself as “a global community of over 4,000 grassroots changemakers in 116 countries,” offering seed funding and support for leaders working toward “a kinder, more compassionate world.” But in practice, “aligned changemakers” often means animal-rights and environmental extremists, many of whom vilify agriculture and label livestock simply as “non-human animals.”

Despite its name, less than 7% of PCRM’s members are actual physicians. Membership is open to virtually anyone, regardless of credentials, making its medical authority highly questionable. As the watchdog site Activist Facts notes, PCRM has 'successfully duped the media and much of the general public' into believing its pronouncements represent mainstream medical opinion, when in fact they reflect the agenda of a small activist group.

According to its own website, the mission of the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) is to “secure legally recognized fundamental rights for nonhuman animals through litigation, legislation, and education.” At its core, NhRP seeks to change the legal status of animals by granting them “personhood,” effectively affording them the same legal rights as human beings. They pursue this through lawsuits, grassroots organizing, and public policy campaigns.

The National Veterinary Council differs little from HSUS or similar groups. Its only novelty is in leveraging veterinarians’ respected reputations to lend credibility to extremist policies. This façade is manipulative—designed to trick the public into believing veterinarians broadly support these measures.

Under current leadership, the Kirkpatrick Foundation has aligned itself with radical animal rights and environmental groups whose agendas threaten Oklahoma agriculture, hunting, animal ownership, and even the state’s cultural traditions.

The Humane Farming Association (HFA) presents itself as a pro-farmer group, but a closer look reveals its true nature as an animal extremist organization. Their choice to exclude the word animal from their name seems intentional, designed to mask their real agenda.

The Humane Society Legislative Fund (HSLF)—now operating as the Humane World Action Fund (HWAF)—is the political and lobbying machine of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), which itself rebranded in 2025 as Humane World for Animals (HWA). Despite its compassionate-sounding name, the organization’s primary goal is to influence policy and elections, not to care for shelter animals.

GREY2K USA Worldwide markets itself as the leading advocate against greyhound racing, presenting a polished image of compassion and reform. But beneath the showy fundraising appeals lies a far more complex—and troubling—organization. With close ties to larger animal rights networks, allegations of misinformation, and financial practices that raise eyebrows, GREY2K reveals the anatomy of a modern activist machine.

Faunalytics markets itself as a neutral research hub, but its partnerships, methods, and output expose it as an ideological activist group disguised as science. Its true goal is to destabilize animal agriculture and enforce a vegan agenda worldwide. For those who value food security, freedom of choice, and the well-being of rural communities, Faunalytics’ activities are not just misleading—they are a threat that must be challenged.

Farm Sanctuary is not a harmless “sanctuary.” It is a political machine disguised as compassion, dedicated to dismantling animal agriculture through ballot initiatives, propaganda, and extremist partnerships.