Upon close inspection, we can see that the UN’s SDGs are neither truly about sustainability or development. Instead, there is colorful language with vague promises that propose a very unsustainable and inequitable way to get there. It is worth asking the question, who is benefitting the most from these propositions? Is it to create a new world for everyone or to place some strategic restrictions to build a better world for the select few?

The United Nations wields an enormous amount of power, so much that it should make anyone nervous, or at the very least critical. The sheer size and scope of the organization is immense along with its not-so-subtle agenda and supporters. Agriculture, being the lynchpin of every civilized society, is among one of the first industries to be caught in the UN’s crosshairs for global reformation. To put this into clear perspective, let’s examine how it gets caught up in the infamo

The goal has always been to control the world’s wealth, resources, and population and the UN is making massive headway under the Rio and Paris accords.

If you could imagine what the world will look like in one hundred years, what do you see? A more moderate climate? A healthier population with longer life expectancy? What would you be willing to sacrifice so future generations can experience the utopian view of a few elites? Are you willing to sacrifice your personal freedoms, property rights, possessions, your favorite foods, vacations, jobs you love, and even your beloved pets?

The work Western Justice does is focused on our right to own, enjoy, and humanely use animals as part of our Western lifestyles and livelihoods, from animal-centered sports to ranching. But did you know that it’s just one piece of a much larger puzzle in the global battle for human freedoms and prosperity?

In Coulee City, Washington, a generational ranching family stands accused of crimes they didn’t commit—because the state decided to make an example of them. What began as a minor bureaucratic dispute has become a full-blown crusade, weaponizing environmental law against the very people who help feed America.

The Humane Farming Association (HFA) presents itself as a pro-farmer group, but a closer look reveals its true nature as an animal extremist organization. Their choice to exclude the word animal from their name seems intentional, designed to mask their real agenda.

The group’s co-founder and president, Ingrid Newkirk, has openly declared that PETA’s ultimate goal is “total animal liberation,” which means eliminating virtually all forms of human-animal interaction. In practice, this would outlaw the consumption of meat, milk, cheese, eggs, butter, yogurt, and even honey, while banning hunting, fishing, zoos, aquariums, animal-centered sports, pet ownership, and life-saving animal-based medical research.

Anti-human rewilding ideology originated in the Third Reich

Rewilding ecoterrorism threatens rural America

American Prairie intends to rewild millions of contiguous acres in rural Montana

The wolves and bears haven’t officially shown up yet, but the biggest predator of all has already arrived, and it’s called American Prairie.

TNC's carefully crafted image obscures a quiet war on agriculture, property rights, and science-based animal care

WEG has an unreasonable bias against ranching, and a strong affinity for wolves

CBD is a powerful menace, not just to natural resource industries, but to people and society.

The CBD is a multimillion-dollar nonprofit with a substantial portion of their income coming from government grants

Welfare environmentalist group WWP relies on taxpayers’ money to fund their incessant litigation

The Sierra Club is the oldest and most notorious environmental extremist group in the United States.

Socially Responsible Agricultural Project (SRAP), is closely tied to a number of radical animal rights groups and other NGOs