Upon close inspection, we can see that the UN’s SDGs are neither truly about sustainability or development. Instead, there is colorful language with vague promises that propose a very unsustainable and inequitable way to get there. It is worth asking the question, who is benefitting the most from these propositions? Is it to create a new world for everyone or to place some strategic restrictions to build a better world for the select few?

Like many animal rights groups, SRAP cloaks its mission in appealing language about “protecting family farms” and “preserving natural resources.” However, their ultimate objective is clear: to end animal agriculture. They leverage emotional rhetoric, misleading data, and grassroots front groups to gain support and donations while pushing an extremist anti-farming agenda.

Under current leadership, the Kirkpatrick Foundation has aligned itself with radical animal rights and environmental groups whose agendas threaten Oklahoma agriculture, hunting, animal ownership, and even the state’s cultural traditions.

The Humane Farming Association (HFA) presents itself as a pro-farmer group, but a closer look reveals its true nature as an animal extremist organization. Their choice to exclude the word animal from their name seems intentional, designed to mask their real agenda.

Faunalytics markets itself as a neutral research hub, but its partnerships, methods, and output expose it as an ideological activist group disguised as science. Its true goal is to destabilize animal agriculture and enforce a vegan agenda worldwide. For those who value food security, freedom of choice, and the well-being of rural communities, Faunalytics’ activities are not just misleading—they are a threat that must be challenged.

Farm Sanctuary is not a harmless “sanctuary.” It is a political machine disguised as compassion, dedicated to dismantling animal agriculture through ballot initiatives, propaganda, and extremist partnerships.